The Third Postage Due Issue of 1933-1935
This was the last postage due issue to be printed by the British American Bank Note Company (BABN) before the contract reverted to the Canadian Bank Note Company in 1935. Despite the relatively short period of use, there are some interesting gum varieties, as well as some neat shades of colour. Unitrade refers to the basic colour as dark violet, and some stamps are indeed this shade. However, I find that there are more stamps in various shades of bluish, greyish and slate lilac than the pure, deep violet.
The Stamps, Issue Dates and Quantities Issued
The scans below give some indication of the range of shades that can be found on these stamps. As always, my colour names are based on the Stanley Gibbons Stamp Colour Key.
The stamp on the left is deep bluish lilac, whereas the one on the right is deep slate lilac. You can hopefully see that the colour on the right is reddish compared to the one on the left, but duller at the same time. This dullness is a result of the addition of grey to the basic lilac colour. The deep bluish lilac is, by far, the most common shade, based on the stamps I have looked at.
The stamp on the left is deep dull violet, whereas the one on the right is deep violet. Both stamps are very similar to the deep bluish lilac, but are more bluish, whereas all lilac shades are reddish compared to all violet shades. The difference between deep violet and deep dull violet may not be readily apparent from these scans, but in the flesh, the deep violet contains no hint of grey, whereas there is a slight greyish cast to the deep dull violet.
As far as I can determine, all four of these shades could potentially exist on all four values. There may even be some redder shades. It would be a fun exercise to study these in more detail to see if there are any more shades other than what I show here.
Paper and Gum Variations
The paper shows little variation on these stamps, and on all stamps that I have examined, it is vertical wove. However, there is one minor difference that bears mention: on some stamps, the fine vertical mesh is barely visible, when the stamp is viewed face down and the back examined. However, most stamps are on a smooth cream paper, that does not clearly show the mesh. My belief is that the stamps on paper showing mesh are from printings made between 1933 and 1934, while those on the more opaque paper date from 1934 to 1935. This belief is based on my observation that the commemoratives from 1933, being #202, #203 and #204 tend to be on paper showing mesh, while #208, #209 and #210, which are 1934 issues, are almost always on this creamy opaque paper.
The gum however shows much variation, ranging in colour from deep brownish yellow, to a very light cream, while the sheen varies from a glossy sheen, to a semi-gloss, which appears to be the most common, to a satin sheen. The scans below show some of the differences:
There are currently no known plate flaws or re-entries on these stamps, and given the fact that the print quantities were lower than most issues of the period, it is possible that there truly are none. However, high printing quantities are not a prerequisite for the appearance of either plate flaws or re-entries. All it really takes is a bit of damage to the plate, or uncharacteristic wear that required re-working of the plate. So it is quite possible that one or more of the stamps in this set may have one or more flaws, or re-entries. You really would have to study many dozens or hundreds of examples and see what turns up.
There was only one plate used to print each value, and the inscription appears at the sides as shown on the block above. All four positions being upper left, lower left, upper right and lower right, exist for each value, for a total of 16 basic plate blocks. They are not terribly expensive, being only a small premium over the price for 4 single stamps. You could potentially expand a plate block collection by looking for all positions in each of the four different shades, as well as the different gum types. It is difficult to speculate on how many different blocks could exist, but if all four values exist in all four shades, and if each of these exist with four different gum types, then there could be as many as 256 different blocks (16 blocks x 4 shades x 4 gums).
Another interesting sideline could involve trying to find these blocks, or plate pairs in used condition. I'm sure that they probably do exist, but would not be common, by any means.
The BNA Proofs website lists only one item for each value in the set, with three known of each. They are valued at between $1,000 and $2,000 each, though you may find yourself having to pay more, or less than these amounts, as you will only likely ever find these for sale at auction. There were no scans of these proofs anywhere on the internet, but the relevant items listed on the website are:
- 1c large die proof on India paper.
- 2c small die proof on glazed paper, mounted on card, initialed LGJ and dated 28/11/33.
- 4c small die proof on glazed paper, mounted on card, initialed LGJ and dated 28/11/33.
- 10c small die proof on glazed paper, mounted on card, initialed LGJ and dated 29/11/33.
The only listed imperforate variety on this issue occurs on the 1c. However, it would stand to reason that the other values should exist as well, but none have, as yet, been reported. It is rare, with only 100 pairs known, and also exists in plate block form. At just $500 in Unitrade for VF pair, it is a very good buy, with a lot of future potential - in my humble opinion anyway.
Cancellations and Postal History
While I have come across both postcards and covers bearing each of the first two postage due issues, I have not personally seen this issue on cover. Unitrade values single usages of the 1c, 2c and 4c at a modest $25-$30 each, which suggests that while scarce, they are not rare. The 1c value would have been used either for the redirection of a local first class letter to a non local address or undeliverable third class printed matter returned to sender. The 2c value would only have been used on mail where the postal deficiency was 1c, so:
- Postcards bearing only 1c postage,
- Local letters bearing only 1c postage, or
- Non-local first class letters bearing only 2c postage.
- Any incoming foreign postcard that had no postage at all.
- Any local postcards or letters bearing no postage at all.
- Any non-local first class letter franked with only 1c, instead of 3c.